Romney’s Plan B: A Brokered Convention





There’s been a lot of chatter lately about the GOP race coming down to a brokered convention. Senator Jim DeMint says it’s a real possibility, and this weekend Sarah Palin said it would not hurt the GOP.

Jonah Goldberg writes for Real Clear Politics:

I could live with either man [Romney or Santorum] being the nominee. And while I would happily vote for either in a contest against Obama, I honestly have no idea who would be more electable. Frankly, I find the prospect of any of them becoming the nominee worrisome and hard to imagine. A brokered convention seems ever more plausible –— and desirable.

Let’s be clear: there is not going to be a brokered convention. Period. The RNC is not going to let it come to that. If it becomes clear that we are heading in that direction, there will be negotiations, agreements and deals made, everything done beforehand to avoid it. Why? For the simple reason that a brokered convention will only help Barack Obama.

As far as the RNC and the GOP are concerned, the Republicans need to get to the general election as quickly as possible. The longer the primary drags out, the more in disarray the republicans appear and the more time the democrats have to organize without having to spend much of the $1 billion on hand.

I’m not saying I like it, but it’s a fact. Two months for the general is just not long enough. So you can be sure that the RNC will do whatever it takes to avoid it.

But for the sake of argument, should it come to it, who does a brokered convention really help?

For all those who are complaining about the establishment running things, the definition of a brokered convention is nothing more than “the establishment running things.” In a smoke-filled back room, they get together and do their political horse-trading, choose the candidate and come out and tell us who the nominee will be.

The theory a new candidate may emerge at a brokered convention is just that — a theory. Imagine the scenario where that happens. There will be an outcry from the primary voters. It is one thing to accept that the candidate they voted for didn’t win in their state. At least the guy they didn’t vote for won in a fair race. But to let someone who didn’t even compete get the nomination? People will simply not accept that. This is 2012, not 1912. It’s safe to say that in a brokered convention one of the candidates currently in the race will get the nomination.

With the establishment running things, who do you think that helps? Newt Gingrich?  No way the establishment will even let him get any close to the nomination. They loathe the man. Ron Paul isn’t even running for the nomination, he’ll be easy to do a deal with. A prime time speech at the convention will do it for him.

That leaves Santorum and Romney. While Santorum may be an “acceptable” candidate to the establishment should he win the nomination outright, he will not be the one the establishment picks should it come down to a brokered convention. At that point second place will look pretty good for Santorum, and he might even settle for a cabinet position deal.

A brokered convention guarantees Romney gets the nomination. The only way it affects him is that he might have to settle for Santorum on the ticket rather than picking the VP of his choice.

With all the chatter of a brokered convention, Romney has us exactly where he wants us.

Be careful what you wish for.



Tags: , , ,
  • http://profile.yahoo.com/IBLOOK267B5CCIIK2RLARHJUII Energene

    The real winner of a brokered convention will be Obama. It lets him save his ad money, and concentrate on voter fraud – he’s going to need a lot. He has lost 70% mexicans (no jobs, they don’t want illegals, or gangs), 80% catholics (what a blunder for him, even Biden told him not to), 40% women (food & gas prices), 65% youth (no jobs), and even 10% of the blacks, they still think he is one of their own and not a muslim, which is bizarre. He will sell them all down the river as soon as he is re-elected, tyranny does not need interest groups or a base, just military backed martial law. Think I’m crazy? Go on the net for a few hours.
    I would have believed the establishment hates Gingrich until I heard him talk about public/private partnerships, but he won the debate hands down, there is still a lot to like.
    Santorum destroyed himself in the debate Wed. by saying he voted for bills he did not like because he had to play the team – really, and where is his fiscal plan – you know, what we need the most? Lower manufacturing taxes is way not enough.
    Romney said the right things, still appears presidential – can we believe him, he owes a lot of establishment favors everywhere, he should just say Romneycare was a real bad idea.
    Ron Paul came up with a much better reason for his absurd foreign policy, could he just pretend to want to keep Iran from nukes? He has a great fiscal plan. 

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0
  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Norton/100002228997007 John Norton

    Say Sheya You shoot frm. the hip do you not sir…? Replace that fourflush of a firelite sir you have in charge over at P4A… Im suprized at you that you should let someone push a false Meme about our next commander in chief Sarah Palin… She banned me for stickin up for Sarah… She does what the mods are doing at C4P and pushes the false meme of Sarah the Cheerleader deleting peoples comments at first then outright banning them when they disagree…Despite all of your efforts to the contrary she will be our next Commander in Chief… I can do a better job at it then who you left in charge… Shame on you…!

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0